Case Analysis & Resources
Recent News
Plain-language analysis of revenge porn, sextortion, AI deepfake, and nonconsensual intimate image cases — written by attorneys who represent survivors.
Why Doe v. X Matters for Revenge-Porn Victims Nationwide
AI, permanence, and federal remedies: why this case forces questions into the open that survivors have been asking for years.
Doe v. X and the Defenses Platforms Rely On: Section 230, Consent, and “We Didn’t Create It”
Understanding the predictable defenses—Section 230, hosting vs. creation, and consent—that platforms use when survivors sue over nonconsensual intimate images.
Doe v. X: Why This Lawsuit Was Filed—and What the Plaintiff Is Alleging
A pseudonymous plaintiff sues X Corp. and xAI in federal court, raising questions about platform responsibility and AI use of nonconsensual intimate images.
New Federal Lawsuit Exposes Cyberbullying and Revenge Porn in the Gaming Community
Tayts v. Gacutan: a federal lawsuit alleging years of coordinated harassment, doxxing, and nonconsensual sharing of explicit 3D renders in the modding community.